Dil Roberts Photography

Panasonic GM5 -Tamron 14-150 f3.5-5.8 DI III (C001)
Olympus E-PL1 - Olympus 14-150 f4.0-5.6
Olympus E-M10 II - Olympus 12-200 f3.5-6.3
Panasonic GM5 - Panasonic G Vario 14-140 f3.5-5.6
Fujifilm XT-100 - Fujinon XF 18-55 f2.8-4.0 R LM OIS
Fujifilm X-T30  - Fujinon XC 50-230 f4.5-6.7 OIS II
Fujifilm X-T30  - Fujinon XC 50-230 f4.5-6.7 OIS II
Olympus E-M5 II -Panasonic Leica DG 12-60 f2.8-4.0
Panasonic GM5 - Panasonic Lumix 45-150 f4.0-5.6
Panasonic GM5 - Panasonic G Lumix 45 - 150 f4.0-5.6

Photoblog of Random Images


Apr 2024
<
>
SMTWTFS
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
2829301234
567891011

[prev] 1 ... 343 344 345 [346] 347 348 349 ... 445 [next]3451-3460 of 4445

Blog Search:        

Category Search:



03/28/14
Sony Alpha A7R - Carl Zeiss Tessar 85 f4 ZM T*

Sony Alpha A7R - Carl Zeiss Tessar 85 f4 ZM T*

I've come to the conclusion these Zeiss lenses work excellently on the Sony Alpha cameras. I now have two of these wonderful lenses and I can't fault either of them. Both the Planar 50 f2 and the Tessar 85 f4 are very well built, focus rings are nice and smooth and don't have a long throw like a lot of the Voigtländer lenses. Both of these lenses produce stunning image quality on the A7R so assume that the quality will be the same on the A7.

 

These are two lenses I can certainly recommend for the A7R (and A7) and will be a part of my prime kit for those cameras. I will not be purchasing any other FE lenses (I have the kit 28-70) because these primes produce what I'm after from these cameras. I don't shoot sport and I take my time when manually focusing, although I have noticed it's much harder on these full frame sensors. I will be practicing a lot more to get proficient because I just love the look of the files. The two lenses mentioned above do not cost a fortune and are readily available with many retailers. Now I just need good 35mm and 135mm lenses and I'll be all set. I've just seen some excellent images from the Voigtländer 15 f4.5 so that will be my ultra-wide for this system. That will probably be used on the A7 because of the colour shift problems on the A7R, or it will be used on both when going for some monochrome images.

 

If you're wondering what you are looking at in the above image, it's water flowing over the top of a lock near where I live. You're looking down at the water from the top of the lock.

 

 

811
ILCE-7R
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: f/1.0
Exposure Time: 1/320 sec
ISO: 200
Dil 03/28/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 811
• Sony • Alpha • A7R • Zeiss • Tessar • 85 f4 

03/27/14
Sony Alpha A7R - Carl Zeiss Planar 50 f2 ZM T*

Sony Alpha A7R - Carl Zeiss Planar 50 f2 ZM T*

What a great combination these two make. The Zeiss Planar 50 f2 ZM T* is a very sharp lens and the A7R doesn't have a AA filter remember so it's going to bring out a little more sharpness from the lens. Just to show what this combination is capable of I just reduced these images to 1200px wide and did NOT apply any sharpening to the files. The B&W was converted using a gradient map this time (I didn't use my favourite converter from Nik, SFXII) because I find it does a better job of these files that SFXII. Files from the Fujifilm X cameras are a different thing but that is a photoblog post for another time.

828
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/27/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 828
• Sony • Alpha • A7R • Zeiss • Planar • 50 f2 

03/26/14
Fujifilm X-E2 - Voigtländer Nokton 40 f1.4

Fujifilm X-E2 - Voigtländer Nokton 40 f1.4

Being so imressed with the image quality of the Fuji lenses on my X-E1, I had to go out and test the X-E2 when it came out. The reason I wanted to look at it was for a couple of reasons. 1. Focusing on the X-E1 wasn't exactly fast and 2. General response time in the evf. Both of these have been resolved in the X-E2. Although it's not a great leap in the new features segment, what has been improved was well worth the upgrade. Now I'll have a camera for my two Fujinon lenses that I use, the 18-55 kit lens and the 55-200, both of which are exceptional lenses and cheap at the price.

I also have some adapters for my manual focus lenses which I'll be putting through their paces when time permits. In the image above you can see the Voigtländer Nokton 40 f1.4 lens mounted on the X-E2 giving me a 60mm equivalent lens. Looks good too.

858
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/26/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 858
• Fujifilm • Nokton • 40 f1.4 • Voigtländer • X-E2 

03/25/14
Sony Alpha A7 - Zeiss Planar 50 f2 ZM T*

Sony Alpha A7 - Zeiss Planar 50 f2 ZM T*

I just couldn't resist this Sony Alpha A7, it's perfect for my type of photography. I love using older (and newer) legacy manual focus lenses on modern digital cameras. And this is principly the reason I purchased the A7. A bonus for the camera is the E mount which allows you to use all the native E mount lenses on the market today, albeit at a lower resolution. By lower resolution I mean 15MP files which is about the same as the best M43 camera on the market today, and with those you can safely print a 45cm x 30cm size but how often do you print at those sizes? So any smaller prints are going to be exceptional. Sony are planning on bringing out their FE lenses for the Alpha system but I'm not planning on aquiring any of those except the 28-70 I bought with the camera. I like at least one native lens for each system just to see how it actually performs with those lenses mounted.

 

 

Be careful when using rangefinder lenses on these Alpha models, just as you had to be careful what you used on the Nex-7. Colour shift will hapen with these lenses at focal lengths of 35mm ond wider. SLR lenses don't cause this problem and you have a lot of lenses to chose from. Everyone has their favourites and mine are C/Y and Pentax which have proved to be excellent on other systems.

 

 

However, that doesn't mean these lenses will perform well on the Alpha cameras because they are of course full frame. With the other systems the sensors used are either APS-C or M43 and using the sweet spots of the lenses, the central portion. Problems normally occur at the edges where smearing can be seen and testing each lens before use is a must on these cameras. I like using a 50mm lens, hence my purchase of the Zeiss Planar 50 f2 which performs very well on the A7. I thought I would pay a little more for one lens which I could use for years to come and no further purchases would be necessary. I will report back with some images from this lens when I have the time.


I think one thing should be said here about the Sony Nex family of cameras and that is the name Nex has been retired and no more Nex cameras will be brought to market. The Nex cameras have only be renamed Alpha cameras so we may see another Nex camera come to market only it will be called an Alpha.  

1048
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/25/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 1048
• Sony • Alpha • A7 • Zeiss • Planar • 50 f2 

03/24/14
Panasonic LX5

Panasonic LX5

I decided to end this composite series with some images from the Panasonic LX5. These to me are quite remarkable because when take the sensor size into account (it's a 1/1.6" sensor) you realize that you don't need an expensive camera and/or lens to get some great images today.

One of the questions you must ask yourself today is "What am I going to use the camera for?". If you're just going to post to the Internet or on one of the social media sites then the lowliest of today's cameras would be enough for you. Take the Panasonic LX5 for instance, a 10MP camera. Nowadays when posting to the Internet an image will be either 800px or 1200px on it's longest side because you also have to cater for those with older monitors. When posting something to a forum or when introducing images to a blog post, the aim is not to show images at full resolution (you can't really anyway), but to supplement the text with some visual content. Personally, I keep a photoblog here and I use text to supplement my random images, but the maximum size I post is 1200px, and that very rarely.

So why do we tend to buy cameras that are mostly overkill in terms or resolution? One reason is that the newer cameras come with massive resolution. A good example of this is the Sony RX100II which is undoubtedly a very fine camera but do you really need that 20MP resolution? I certainly don't and I can't see professionals using this camera to make large prints or posters either although that may be possible. I would think that the professional would use the appropriate equipment if the intended output is print. One possible advantage to these images could be of course cropping. A 20MP image will allow you to crop and still have enough resolution to print an image at a reasonable standard size, or, if you want the compost ion to be slightly different then the resolution is there that allows you to do this.

Now, saying that professionals would use the appropriate equipment to some serious work, I read an article some time towards the end of last year that really opened my eyes as to what is possible. It was an article by Ming Thein and you can find it here. All his images in that post were maid my an iPhone,really. If you don't know Ming Thein, pop over to his blog and take a look, it has a plethora of information and some videos to purchase. He is a very good photographer that could create far better images than myself with a throwaway camera. Can you see me turning green with envy :-)

People are different, some are very musical, some can draw and paint Ming Thein is for me an extraordinary photographer and I know that I won't reach his level of excellence it doesn't matter what camera I own. So, the next time you're thinking about purchasing a camera, just ask yourself what you're going to get out of it. Personally, I just wish I had half the talent of a lot of photographers.


971
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/24/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 971
• Panasonic • LX5 

03/23/14
Canon G1X

Canon G1X

This point and shoot was really the most surprising camera of 2013 for me. The sensor is very good and is a 1.5" sensor. I must ask myself though why Canon didn't put an useable EVF or larger OVF in it. That would have made it perfect for me. As it is it's my go evrywhere camera where I'm not sure what to expect and I just want to blend in with the croud. Just looks like a G15/16, so it's somebody with a P&S and not worth a second look. My eyes not being what they once were, I have to wear my glasses to really compose which is a PITA really. It's also a reason why I normally don't use these cameras in this way.

Being quite small it fits in my shoulder bag or rucksack without any problems and battery life is pretty good. It's a sort of camera that you use if you want to take a single shot of something and definately not for anything that's moving. The above images show what's possible and I'll be using this camera on long walks in good light. I don't think Canon will be bringing out a second version of this camera, which is a real shame really, as a couple of improvement would make this camera a hot seller. I wish I could be a fly on a wall when these cameras are being designed, just to hear what actually goes on behind the scenes; like why did they bring this to market and what the idea was behind it.


1155
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/23/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 1155
• Canon • G1X 

03/22/14
Panasonic LX5

Panasonic LX5

Some random images from the "old" Panasonic LX5 camera.
1094
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/22/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 1094
• Panasonic • LX5 

03/21/14
Sony Nex-5N - Minolta Rokkor 90 f4

Sony Nex-5N - Minolta Rokkor 90 f4

I have 2 of these 90mm maual focus lenses, this one the Minolta Rokkor 90 f4 and the Leica Elmarit 90 f2.8. The Minolta is smaller and lighter (should be because maximum aperture is f4). On these APS-C (and m4/3) sensors it's very difficult to determine which has the better image quality. I like both but the real test would be to use both on a full frame camera.

That wasn't possible until recently when Sony brought out the A7 & A7r. I will not be looking at the A7r because the price is out of my comfort zone but the A7 has me attracted. It's small, light and offers full frame possibilities to all of my Leica, Minolta and Voigtländer lenses. The fact that autofocus is not really fast doesn't interest me in the least because I woulld use it mainly for my legacy manual focus lenses. Because it has an E mount it is compatible with all the E mount and A mount (via the LEA4 adapter) lenses. Actually it's compatible to most lenses ever produced, just like the Nex series of cameras. It's really an exciting camera (the A7r more so) that I am really contemplating on aquiring.

Sony have now dropped the Nex name and all future cameras will have the Alpha designation. This doesn't mean that the Nex line has been discontinued, it's just that in the future they'll have a different name.

I'll have to think more carefully about this in the coming days. Any other thoughts out there?

1217
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/21/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 1217
• Sony • Nex-5N • Minolta • Rokkor • 90 f4 

03/20/14
Sony Nex-5N - Voigtländer Nokton 40 f1.4

Sony Nex-5N - Voigtländer Nokton 40 f1.4

When I first got into manual focusing lenses on digital cameras a few years ago, this is one of the first lenses I bought new and why I afterwards bought so many of the Voigtländer lenses. As I was a Canon system enthusiast I use to turn my nose up at these lenses and only used autofocus lenses, not understanding what all the fuss was all about. Now, being a little more experienced and having learnt my lesson I can understand what it's all about and autofocus is no longer such a big deal.

I suppose everyone changes with time and the more you photograph the more inquisitive you become about what is possible and how other lenses would see the world using different lenses on different cameras. It's just a part of growing as a photographer and as you come to realise that different lenses have different signatures, it matters a great deal on what cameras you use the lenses on. I think that's why I have so many different camera models from many manufacturers. These Voigtländer lenses are a real alternative to Leica lenses, especially when you start to compare prices. I'm not saying they're better than the Leica lenses, it's just that I'm not a professional at this game, and I'm not going to pay thousands for lens that will give me maybe 5-10% better image quality.

Another manufacturer I haven't tried yet is Zeiss and I've only heard good things about their lenses. Maybe in the coming months I can find the funds to purchase o lens or two. One I'm really trying to hold off on is the ZM 50 f2 Planar. I've heard it pairs nicely with the new Sony A7 or A7r cameras.

1131
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/20/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 1131
• Sony • Nex-5N • Voigtländer • 40 f1.4 • Nokton 

03/19/14
Fujifilm X100S

Fujifilm X100S

Every time I come back to the Fujifilm X100S images my comment is always "These are the best files I have ever seen". Granted, I haven't used a Nikon D800 or D800E and I have no intention of doing so, but for my purposes they are the best quality I can imagine. Best of all, conversion to B&W is the best I've seen too. I don't do a lot of monochrome shooting straight from camera but tend to convert them in PP using Nik SFXII. If you haven't used this plug-in do yourself a favour and try it out. Really remakable piece of software.

I'm certain of it that before the end of this composite series there will be another one from this camera. I don't know what you think, but I now have a Fujifilm X100S, an X-E1 and an X-E2 in my arsenal. The Fuji cameras might not be the fastest AF cameras on the market and aren't meant for sport shooters but they are excellent for all other kinds of pphotography. High ISO images are exemplary, and many other manufacturers could look at these Fujifilm cameras to see how it's really done. Of course, Fujifilm use another type of sensor (X-Trans) but I have to admire them for being so innovative and have the guts to try something new. I just can't see Canon or Nikon trying something like this, being so conservative and are so slow to adjust to the market.

923
unknown
Focal Length: unknown
Aperture: unknown
Exposure Time: unknown
ISO: unknown
Dil 03/19/14 19:00     comments (0)
your name*

emailaddress*

comments*
You may use these HTML tags:<p> <u> <i> <b> <strong> <del> <code> <hr> <em> <ul> <li> <ol> <span> <div>

verification code*
 


 Viewed 923
• Fujifilm • X100S 


[prev] 1 ... 343 344 345 [346] 347 348 349 ... 445 [next]3451-3460 of 4445