This is an impresssive lens, it doesn't matter which camera you put it on it seems to always deliver. In this case I put it on the Olympus E-M5 and that camera has enough dynamic range that the highlights didn't blow and the blacks didn't block, which normally is the case. It is very sharp and seems to be best at f4 - f5.6. It was set at f5.6 for this image. Micro contrast is good and the colours are snappy, just the way I like it.
PhotoBlog of Random Images
          |
Photoblog of Random Images
|
| Blog Search:
Category Search:
|
11/03/13  Olympus E-M5 - Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 25 f1.41092
E-M5 Focal Length: 25 mm Aperture: f/5.6 Exposure Time: 1/160 sec ISO: 250 11/02/13  Olympus E-PL1 - Voigtländer 90 f3.5 M MountThe last post regarding this combination at present. I think this 90mm lens will be used pretty frequently in the future. I still have to see what it's like on the Nex-5n and Nex-7 cameras and I have a feeling the image quality will be a little better than on the m4/3 cameras. 1013
E-PL1 Focal Length: unknown Aperture: f/1.0 Exposure Time: 1/1600 sec ISO: 200 • Olympus • E-PL1 • 90 f3.5 • Voigtländer
11/01/13  Olympus E-PL1 - Voigtländer 90 f3.5 M MountSome may find the colours in this image a bit off, but I like it the way it is and the image is sharp. I like this focal length which might explain why I have a few of these 90mm lenses which gives 180mm 35mm eqivalence. I'm just going to post a couple of images from this lens which shows what can be expected from this combination. I'm thinking that I'll get better performance from the E-M5 so I'll test it on that camera when time permits. 1270
E-PL1 Focal Length: unknown Aperture: f/1.0 Exposure Time: 1/1250 sec ISO: 200 • Olympus • E-PL1 • Voigtländer • 90 f3.5
10/31/13  Olympus E-PL1 - Voigtländer 90 f3.5 M MountI've been looking for one of these for some time. The ones I found were in excellent condition but the asking price was simply too steep. And then one came up on ebay for a good price and I took the plunge. I've heard good things about it and wanted it for my Nex and Olympus systems. I tend to use the Nex system mostly for manual focus legacy lenses and the Olympus E-PL1 gets used for the same purpose. I find manual focusing with the E-PL1 better than all the remaining Olympus cameras. Don't ask me why, it must be a personal thing. The fact that it has the old 12MP sensor in it doesn't really matter, although when using the new sensors you can tell that the sensor is getting old. The new sensors Olympus are using are so much better. I've been waiting for a m4/3 camera with focus peaking and all of a sudden Olympus and Panasonic bring them out onto the market. Which one I'll go for is uncertain but I will buy one just for these lenses. If anyone is interested in these manual focus lenses I can highly recomment the Voigtländer lenses (made by Cosina) because they offer a lot and the price is right. Build quality is very high and they really shine on these modern cameras. You can buy some very cheap legacy lenses from all manufacturers (present and past) but I like to know what I'm going to get. I'll spend a little more, but guaranteed the image quality is that much better. Take a look at the composite above and tell me that you're not impressed by the image quality. 1322
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown • Olympus • Voigtländer • E-PL1 • CV 90 f3.5
10/30/13  Panasonic G5 - Panasonic G Vario PZ 14-42 f3.5-5.6I really don't know what to make of this lens. Since I used it on the GF1 a few months ago and it performed ok-ish I thought it might perform better on the G5. I took it for a little outing just to see how it performed and it turned out to be a worse performer on the G5 than on the GF1. I had a lot of misfocused images that I was about to put it on ebay to get rid of it. I must say this must be the worst performing lens in Panasonics arsenal, though I haven't tested the PZ 45-175 lens and to tell you the truth I'm not even going to contemplate it. It's the same design as the PZ 14-42 and since they're smaller than the other lenses it would have saved me a lot of space, if things had turned out ok. On the G5 the images were quite soft and focusing was a hit and miss affair. The combination is very fast focusing and the image in the EVF looked sharp and I even got a green focusing confirmation box. Well, after running the images through LR5 and opening them in PS I immediately had to throw away about 50% of the images. They were simply misfocused or very soft. The soft images were not misfocused, just soft and I was quite shocked. I never expected this. My conclusion is this lens will only be used on the GF1 where it perfoms ok and only when I really need to save space. I believe this is the first lens from any manufacturer that I simply cannot recommend. In this case you really get what you pay for - not a lot! Shame. 1237
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown • Panasonic • G5 • 14-42 f3.5-5.6
10/29/13  Nikon V1 - 1 Nikkor 32 f1.2I took the V1 down to the aquarium a couple of weeks ago. I stuck the 32 f1.2 on it to see what it could really do under these conditions. I think the above compilation says it all. People who say that this system is useless and totally crap, do not know what they're talking about. Ok it's still not as good at high ISO values but personally I'm not complaining. That silent shutter is amazing (plug: the GX7 has one too). Strange how I keep coming back to that camera. 1177
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown 10/28/13  Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 - Panasonic Leica 14-150 f3.5-5.6 O.I.S.I sometimes go back and look up my old images from the archives and sometimes I really find an image that I missed at the time I processed them. Some photographer say that once you have processed your images, don't look at them for a couple of months, then come back to them and look at them again. This is supposed to get some distance from those images and when you come back to them, it's like seeing them for the first time with a fresh eye. That's exactly what I did here but the images are a few years old. I still think they are great images and that from a camera that looks like a brick and has one of the worst OVF of all time, but that's my opinion. The Panasonic is still on ebay for around €300 to €400 and the Leica Digilux 3 (same camera, different firmware) is going for between €500 and €600. That says something about this now ancient (in digital terms) camera. I think this is my favourite camera of all time because I got some marvelous images out of it, but then again I was using it with a couple of great lenses. The kit lens, 14-50 f2.8-3.5 OIS, was quite heavy but has great image quality. I still use mine today although I haven't used it for some time because I've been testing some other stuff lately. The second lens is the PL 14-150 f3.5-5.6 OIS and is still my favourite lens of all time. It is sharp at all focal lenths and at all apertures. Those that haven't used this lens don't know what they've missed. It's pure magic on the L1. But, it's still quite expensive today. It's still going for over a €1000 new. That's about how much I paid for it, and that is some years ago. Worth every cent though. Although the camera was only a 7.5MP camera The resulting images were of a very high standard. I used to process these using Silkypix and I was very happy with the resulting images. Just look at the those images in the compilation above, I think it says it all. So why bring up these images again now? Well I was thinking about the Panasonic GX7 camera and it really reminds me of the L1. Personally I think this is the new L1 because they really look alike. Some say that it's the next GX1 or G3 replacement but I don't buy that at all. This is the new L1 and I'm looking hard at that camera. One of the main reasons I'm looking at it is that it has focus peeking (in different colours) and it has a built-in wiewfinder as well as an internal OIS system. This really makes it perfect for me as it's what I was waiting for in a m4/3 camera. Some may be asking why not the Olympus E-P5? Well, I just don't want a camera with a large hump on top, especially when I have to pay extra for it. That's it for me, no more cameras with an external viewfinder. Now, about that Panasonic GX7. 1245
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown • Panasonic • L1 • Leica • 14-150 f3.5-5.6
10/27/13  Sony Nex-7 - Sigma 60 f2.8Just another little compilation from the Sigma 60 f2.8. These are just snaps I took on a little walk a week or so ago and I'm even more impressed now than I was with this lens. The Nex cameras aren't really known to be fast focusing cameras so it doesn't matter what lens you put on it, it's not going to speed the camera up in that area. I can't really tell you what the focusing speed is on m4/3 cameras but I should imagine it's a little faster than the Nex. I won't be purchasing these lenses for the m4/3 system since I have the Olympus 12, 45 and 60 macro for that format which are really fast and sharp lenses. They cost more than the Sigma lenses but they really shine on the m4/3 cameras. If these Sigma lenses had been out before I purchased the m4/3 lenses, I'm sure I would have purchased the Sigma lenses because there is quite a difference in price. 1435
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown 10/26/13  Nex-7 - Sigma 60 f2.8I don't know about you, but I'm really impressed by the image above. I'm not really surprised by the quality of the image though since the Sigma 19 anf 30 lenses are equally very good. These lenses are cheap but deliver what Sigma they would. When you look at the pricing for other name brands and look at the image quality you get from those, well, those brands should be ashamed of themselves. These Sigma lenses can be bought for the Nex and the m4/3 mount and from what I've read and seen on the Internet they deliver for both mounts. In the last year or so, Sigma have brought out some great lenses for all mounts and it seems that things are shaping up for them. It might be that it's because of the management changes that took place not long ago, and when I think about it, I can't really think of another reason why the sudden change in quality has occured. The 60 f2.8 lens is no beauty to look at, or the 19 and 30 for that matter but I really couldn't care because the images look great. If you want cheap prime lenses for the Nex or m4/3 mount, look no further than these three lenses. All told the cost will be around €600 for all three lenses. I wonder how they can do that when you look at the price for Canon or Nikon prime lenses. Because the Nex has a x1.5 crop what you really have is a 28mm (19), a 45mm (30) and a 90mm (60), and the 60 makes for a great portrait lens. OK, for some people it'll be too slow at f2.8 but it suits me fine. 1114
NEX-7 Focal Length: 60 mm Aperture: f/2.8 Exposure Time: 1/1600 sec ISO: 100 10/25/13  Nikon V1 - 1 Nikkor VR 6.7-13 f3.5-5.6The image above is a little taste of what's to come from this little lens. If you want a wide angle for the Nikon 1 system, then I can recommend this lens wholeheartedly. As you can see these images are really sharp and although it's not really a fast lens, the VR works well with it. If you're looking for a good review of this lens go to to stevehuffphoto. He puts it to good use and is just as impressed by it as I am. 1140
unknown Focal Length: unknown Aperture: unknown Exposure Time: unknown ISO: unknown • Nikon • V1 • 6.7-13 f3.5-5.6
| |
