I think this is another of the images that I like from this particular shoot. The leaves in the foregroud are in focus with the backgroud out of focus. Bokeh is good and not at all funky. Image taken at f2 with -1 EC dialed in.
PhotoBlog of Random Images
| Blog Search:
Category Search:
|
05/29/13 Fujifilm X100S988
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/2.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 200 05/28/13 Fujifilm X100SNothing special in this image but what did impress me was the fact that when I look at the rust/reddish coloured substance they use in theses places, is that I can actually see all the different corns on the floor. That to me is really amazing. 995
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/4.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 800 05/27/13 Fujifilm X100SHow does it render foliage detail. Well right now I can't say much about the raw files but these jpg image holds up pretty well. Looking at the green leaves at bottom right and the brownish leaves hanging down the wall in the center, I can't fault it at all. The real test of course will come when I get around to developing some raw files. From what I have heard, people aren't too happy with the X-Trans sensor support at present, but I think it can only get better with each release of the raw software. 1054
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/4.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 1000 05/26/13 Fujifilm X100SHow would the camera hold up to this type of scene. The are towards the left of the image was quite bright and relecting off the water. This image shows a lot more detail in the highlights than I could actually see. I expected the image to be underexposed and the dark ares towards the upper left on the image to be really dark. My conclusion here is thaat it managed to hold the highlight on the water while detail is still visible in the dark regions which tells me the dynamic range of the X100S is very good indeed. Only after looking at the image for some time did I realize that there were more kois in the pond than I remember seeing. 995
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/8.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 640 05/25/13 Fujifilm X100SHere's checking how it deals with dark areas. Surprisingly well as you can see. Exposure was very good and again post precessing is very minimal. I just wished I'd have used a smaller aperture than f4. If you look towards the bottom of the image you can see it's getting rather soft or out of focus.
One thing I have noticed, particularly since I've been posting these images from the Fujifilm cameras is that of colour. All these images were processed and posted using a calibrated monitor. Having looked at the images on a couple of non-calibrated monitors brings back home just how important calibrating your monitor is. The colour on the non-calibrated monitos are nothing like what they should be, and misleads the reader on just how good these cameras are at catching the correct colour. Granted, the reader can't compare the images themselves and have to take my word for it.
Just do yourself a favour and get your monitor calibrated, it works wonders for your images. 1103
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/4.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 250 05/24/13 Fujifilm X100SMy favourite test for all cameras I buy, checking out the red channel. As you can see there is no blowing out of the red channel at all. The greens are also nicely saturated but not blown. Although quite dark I didn't use any exposure compensation for this image. It's nearly an OOC jpg. Very nice and the sharpness is there too. 1028
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/4.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 640 05/23/13 Fujifilm X100STesting how the camera deald with front lit subjects. I expected this to be really dark but the camera mastered the exposure really well. I had to very slightly brighten the luminosity in this image but nothing like the levels I would have to do with other systems. 1094
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/8.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 1000 05/22/13 Fujifilm X100SThis is one image that has impressed me the most about this camera. Rich greens and reds without overdoing it. Nothing is blown out and it is sharp. This the way I wish all my images looked. I'm not a friend of some of the images I've seen on the Internet, I wouldn't call them soft but I do prefer a bit of sharpness in an image.
Manual focusing again and hand held I had to open up a bit to keep the shutter speed up. That's the rerason for the background not being sharp. It's outside of the depth of field for the aperture set. The lens was actually nearly wide open at f4 for this image. 1060
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/4.0 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 400 05/21/13 Fujifilm X100SAnother attempt at manual focus. Normally with this sort of image, when using AF the camera will not focus on the relection but on what is closest to the camera. Using manual focus you can override this by focusing on the reflection, which is how it should be. As you can see manual focus works pretty well. 1080
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/5.6 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 200 05/20/13 Fujifilm X100SAfter a lot of talk on some forums regarding mushy foliage with the Fujifilm cameras, I thought I would just test this one out. Well, either this doesn't happen in the jpg files, or it happens only during the raw conversion. I think that now I've seen the files in jpg I think this applies to raw files only. I'll have time to test those out with LR 4.4 very soon and I'll post a comparison to those who are interested. 1102
X100S Focal Length: 23 mm Aperture: f/5.6 Exposure Time: 10/600 sec ISO: 400 | |